Imam Abu Hanifa’s assertion that jurists must be well-versed in social realities and human welfare adds another dimension to the Shia discourse. This perspective supports the Shia emphasis on social justice and the welfare of the community, particularly in response to sociopolitical injustices faced by the ummah (Muslim community).
3. Comparisons to Shia Jurisprudence
While the Hanafi school is recognized for its flexibility and adaptability, it is crucial to examine its distinctive elements vis-à-vis Shia jurisprudence, particularly the Ja’fari school. A salient point of divergence lies in the adherence to specific sources of Hadith. Shia scholars privilege Hadiths attributed to the Infallible Imams, thereby emphasizing the spiritual and temporal authority vested in them. In contrast, abi Hanifa’s relative openness to various narrators reflects a characteristic of Sunni jurisprudence, though certain Shia thinkers adopt a more malleable attitude toward the acceptance of particular Hanafi principles when they align with comprehensive objectives.
Tags
Share this on:
[addtoany]