Abu Hanifa’s jurisprudential principles are built upon several foundational tenets. Central to his framework is the reliance on the Quran and Hadith as primary sources of law. However, he diverged significantly from other scholars by advocating for the use of ra’y (opinion) and qiyas (analogical reasoning) in the interpretation of these texts. This methodological approach fostered an environment where jurisprudential decisions could adapt to cultural and social circumstances, allowing for a more contextual understanding of Islamic teachings.
Moreover, Abu Hanifa’s philosophy reflects a profound respect for individual judgment within the contours of Islamic law. The concept of istihsan (juridical preference), which permits a jurist to favor a certain ruling based on ethical or moral reasoning, is particularly noteworthy. This practice invites a multilayered reading of jurisprudence, including the Shia perspective, which often emphasizes the guidance of the Imams on similar ethical considerations.
Legal Maxims: A bridge between Shia and Sunni
Tags
Share this on:
[addtoany]