Imam Rizas Debate with the Zoroastrian Scholar

Conversely, the Zoroastrian scholar adhered to the dualistic worldview, presenting Ahura Mazda as the epitome of goodness, contrasted with the malevolent Angra Mainyu. The Imam’s logical rebuttal deftly dismantled this dualism by challenging the coherence of a divided divine authority. Through reasoned arguments, he elaborated on the implications of a singular, all-powerful deity, reiterating God’s absolute authority over good and evil, thereby affirming the Islamic perspective of divine omniscience.

Prophethood and the Role of Religious Law

Another pivotal aspect of the debate encompassed the concept of prophethood. Imam Riza emphasized the necessity of a divinely appointed messenger to guide humanity, positing the Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وآله) as the culmination of God’s revelations. The discussion illuminated the distinction between prophetic guidance and philosophical speculation, with the Imam underscoring that genuine knowledge derives from divine revelation rather than mere rational deduction.