Kalam cosmological argument

Transitioning to the second proposition, “the universe began to exist,” we encounter philosophical debates that traverse the realms of both theology and science. The Shia perspective leans upon scriptural evidence intertwined with reasoned inquiry. The assertion that the universe has a finite temporal beginning aligns seamlessly with Quranic exegesis, affirming the notion that the cosmos is not an eternal entity but rather a temporal one, originating at a specific point in time as designated by divine will. This, too, echoes the sentiments of modern cosmological findings, such as the Big Bang theory, which lends credence to the notion of a commencement of the universe.

The culmination of the argument in, “therefore, the universe has a cause,” asserts the imperative nature of a transcendent cause—a cause that is not bound by time or space. Herein lies the uniqueness of the Shia interpretation: it posits that this cause, identified as Allah, possesses attributes of utter perfection, will, and agency. It is essential to acknowledge that this perspective does not merely assert the existence of God but delineates His attributes in relation to creation. Allah is seen as the ultimate source of existence, an entity whose essence is knowable through His manifestations and signs in the cosmos.

Interestingly, the Kalam cosmological argument serves as a philosophical bridge, facilitating dialogues between faith and reason. Within Shia thought, the synthesis of these realms is paramount; rationality complements faith, culminating in a holistic understanding of existence. Scholars often employ this argument not merely to assert the existence of God but to inspire individuals to contemplate their place within the wider cosmic order. The metaphor of the universe as a grand symphony resonates profoundly here. Each instrument, though distinct, contributes to the harmony orchestrated by the divine conductor—each note an expression of the myriad forms of existence.